DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
The Question
Coding

Making A Large Island

You are given an $n \times n$ binary matrix grid. You are permitted to change at most one 0 to a 1. An island is defined as a group of 1s connected 4-directionally (up, down, left, right). Find and return the size of the largest possible island that can be formed after performing this operation at most once. Constraints: - $n == grid.length$ - $n == grid[i].length$ - $1 \le n \le 500$ - $grid[i][j]$ is either $0$ or $1$.
Java
DFS
Flood Fill
Hash Map
Set
Questions & Insights

Clarifying Questions

What is the maximum size of the grid ($n$)? (Knowing if n \le 500 allows for an O(n^2) approach).
How should we handle a grid that is already full of 1s or full of 0s? (Boundary cases for the "at most one" operation).
Is the input matrix mutable? (Determines if we can store island IDs in-place or if we need a separate matrix).
What are the connectivity rules? (Confirmed: 4-directionally connected).

Assumptions

The grid size n is up to 500, making O(n^2) time and space complexity acceptable.
If the grid is all 1s, the answer is n \times n.
If the grid is all 0s, the answer is 1 (by flipping any 0).

Thinking Process

Identify and Label Islands: Use a Flood Fill algorithm (DFS or BFS) to find all connected components of 1s. Assign each unique island a unique integer ID (starting from 2 to distinguish from original 0s and 1s) and calculate its area.
Map ID to Area: Store the mapping of islandId -> area in a hash map or an array. This allows O(1) lookup for the size of any island we encounter.
Evaluate Flipping 0s: Iterate through every cell containing a 0. For each 0, check its 4 neighbors. Identify the unique island IDs among its neighbors (use a Set to avoid counting the same island twice).
Calculate Maximum: The potential island size for a flipped 0 is 1 + \sum(\text{areas of unique neighboring islands}). Track the global maximum. If the grid contains no 0s, return the size of the largest existing island (or n^2).
Implementation Breakdown

Problem Set

Functional Requirements:
Identify connected components in a binary matrix.
Calculate the area of each component.
Calculate the maximum possible area by merging components through a single point.
Constraints:
n == \text{grid.length} == \text{grid[i].length}
1 \le n \le 500
\text{grid}[i][j] is 0 or 1.

Approach

Algorithm: Flood Fill (DFS) + Greedy neighbor checking.
Data Structure: HashMap<Integer, Integer> (Island ID to Size), HashSet<Integer> (Unique neighbor IDs).
Complexity:
Time: O(n^2) to traverse the grid twice (once for labeling, once for checking 0s).
Space: O(n^2) for the recursion stack (or island ID storage if not in-place).

Implementation

Wrap Up

Advanced Topics

Recursion Depth: In Java, a 500 \times 500 grid might cause a StackOverflowError if the island is very snaky. Using an explicit stack for DFS or a Queue for BFS is safer for production environments.
Disjoint Set Union (DSU): This problem can be solved using DSU. For every 1 encountered, union it with its neighbors. The parent array stores component information, and an area array tracks sizes. This is often more efficient for dynamic connectivity but slightly more complex to implement.
Parallelization: The labeling phase (Phase 1) can be partially parallelized by dividing the grid into chunks, though merging the boundaries requires additional logic (similar to parallel connected components algorithms).