DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
The Question
Coding

Word Break

Given a non-empty string s and a list of strings wordDict containing a dictionary of non-empty words, determine if s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words. You may assume the dictionary does not contain duplicate words and each word can be reused multiple times in the segmentation. Example: Input: s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet", "code"] Output: true Explanation: Return true because "leetcode" can be segmented as "leet code". Constraints: - 1 <= s.length <= 300 - 1 <= wordDict.length <= 1000 - 1 <= wordDict[i].length <= 20 - s and wordDict[i] consist of only lowercase English letters.
Java
DP
HashSet
Questions & Insights

Clarifying Questions

Can dictionary words be reused? Yes, words in the wordDict can be used multiple times in the segmentation.
Is the comparison case-sensitive? Usually, yes, "Apple" and "apple" would be distinct unless specified.
What are the constraints on the length of the string and the size of the dictionary? This helps determine if an O(n^2) or O(n^3) approach is acceptable versus needing a Trie-based optimization.
What should be returned for an empty string? Typically, an empty string is segmentable if the logic treats it as a base case, but usually, the input s will have a minimum length of 1.
Assumptions:
The input string s consists of lowercase English letters.
The dictionary contains unique words.
1 \le s.length \le 300.
1 \le wordDict.length \le 1000.

Thinking Process

Identify Subproblems: To know if string S[0...i] is segmentable, we need to find some j < i such that S[0...j] is segmentable AND the substring S[j...i] exists in the dictionary.
Define State: Use a boolean array dp where dp[i] represents whether the prefix of length i.e., s.substring(0, i)) can be segmented into dictionary words.
State Transition: For each position i from 1 to n, check all previous positions j. If dp[j] is true and the substring from j to is in the wordDict, then dp[i] becomes true.
Optimization: Use a HashSet for the dictionary to achieve O(1) average time complexity for word lookups.
Implementation Breakdown

Problem Set

Functional Requirement: Return true if the input string can be segmented; otherwise, return false.
Constraint: The solution must handle strings up to 300 characters efficiently.
Boundary Condition: dp[0] must be initialized to true as the base case for the empty prefix.

Approach

Algorithm: Dynamic Programming (Bottom-Up).
Data Structure: HashSet for O(1) lookups, boolean[] for state tracking.
Complexity:
Time: O(n^2 \cdot k) where n is the length of the string and k is the average length of the substring operation (in Java, substring is O(k)).
Space: O(n + m) where n is the DP array and m is the space for the dictionary in the set.

Implementation

Wrap Up

Advanced Topics

Trie Optimization: If the dictionary is very large and the string is long, we can use a Trie to check valid substrings. Instead of checking all j < i, we can traverse the Trie using characters from s[i...n] to find valid words starting at i.
DFS with Memoization: This can be solved top-down. Memoization ensures that we don't re-calculate the same suffix multiple times, effectively yielding the same complexity as DP.
Space-Time Trade-off: If memory is tight, a recursive approach with a limited-depth cache might be preferred over a full DP table, though in this specific problem, O(n) space is generally negligible.