DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.DowngradedOur downstream service providers are currently experiencing outages, and our engineering team is actively working on a resolution. Some services—including the Solver, Partner, and Tools—are temporarily degraded with higher latency and lower bandwidth. Rest assured, Intervipedia, Solutions, and the Question Bank features are not impacted and remain fully operational.
The Question
Coding

3Sum - Unique Triplets with Zero Sum

Given an integer array nums, return all unique triplets [nums[i], nums[j], nums[k]] such that i != j, i != k, and j != k, and the sum of the elements is exactly zero: nums[i] + nums[j] + nums[k] == 0. Constraints: - 3 <= nums.length <= 3000 - -10^5 <= nums[i] <= 10^5 - The solution set must not contain duplicate triplets.
Java
Two Pointers
Sorting
Questions & Insights

Clarifying Questions

What is the maximum length of the input array nums? (Assumption: Up to 3,000, suggesting an O(n^2) solution is acceptable).
Can the array contain duplicate numbers? (Assumption: Yes, and the result must contain only unique triplets).
What is the range of the integers in the array? (Assumption: Standard 32-bit signed integers; the sum of three won't overflow a 64-bit long, and usually fits in a 32-bit int).
Is the order of triplets in the output or the order of elements within the triplets important? (Assumption: No, but typical solutions return sorted triplets or unique sets).

Thinking Process

Sort and Two-Pointer: Sorting the array is the most efficient precursor. It allows us to use a two-pointer approach to find pairs and easily skip duplicate values to ensure triplet uniqueness.
Fix One, Find Two: Iterate through the array, fixing one element nums[i] as the potential first element of the triplet. The problem then reduces to finding two other numbers in the remaining subarray nums[i+1...n-1] that sum to -nums[i].
Handling Duplicates:
Skip the current nums[i] if it's the same as nums[i-1] to avoid redundant triplets starting with the same value.
Inside the two-pointer loop, after finding a valid triplet, increment the left pointer and decrement the right pointer while they point to values identical to the ones just processed.
Optimization: If the fixed element nums[i] is greater than zero, we can stop immediately because the array is sorted and any subsequent numbers will also be positive, making a zero sum impossible.
Implementation Breakdown

Problem Set

Functional Requirement: Find all unique triplets (a, b, c) such that a + b + c = 0 and indices are distinct.
Constraints:
Time complexity should be O(n^2).
Space complexity should be O(1) or O(\log n) (excluding output storage), depending on the sorting algorithm's stack space.

Approach

Algorithm: Sorting + Two Pointers
Data Structure: java.util.ArrayList, java.util.Arrays
Complexity:
Time: O(n^2) due to the nested loops (one iteration, one two-pointer scan).
Space: O(\log n) to O(n) for the sorting algorithm's internal space.

Implementation

Wrap Up

Advanced Topics

Performance vs. Memory: While the O(n^2) sorting approach is standard, a Hash-based approach (using a HashSet for the inner "Two Sum") can work in O(n^2) time as well but generally uses more memory and is harder to manage for duplicate removal.
K-Sum Generalization: This problem is a specific case of the K-Sum problem. For k > 3, the problem can be solved recursively by reducing k down to 2 (Two Sum), maintaining O(n^{k-1}) complexity.
Parallelization: For very large datasets, the outer loop (fixing nums[i]) can be parallelized, provided the shared result list is handled with proper synchronization or by merging local lists from different threads.